testing wiki

This blog entry discusses a paper about testing the reliancy of wikipedia, with results remind you of the weaknesses of everyone’s favorite cheat sheet. Of course, if it isn’t being purposefully duped, then it’s only clueless people who think they know enough to write entries that get in the way. But if two thirds of the author’s erroneous claims could last 48 hours, then at any given time a clueless entry may be up… Though really, I just like the blog entry for his cute “fibs about philosophers”.

Tags: , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: